Since taking office, President Trump has been derided by the mainstream media and his critics as running roughshod over constitutional norms, fueling the conviction of liberals and some moderate conservatives that the 45th President poses an ongoing threat to the Constitution. In a Heritage Foundation podcast, David Rivkin joins constitutional scholar John Yoo (author of Defender in Chief), who argues that Trump’s adversaries have things exactly backwards. Far from considering Trump an inherent danger to our nation’s founding principles, Yoo contends that the Framers would have seen Trump as restoring their vision of presidential power. It is instead liberal opponents who would overthrow existing constitutional norms in order to unseat Trump, thereby inflicting permanent damage on the presidency.
David Rivkin Online
Recent Tweets
Latest Articles
-
What Jack Smith Gets Wrong About Immunity
The special prosecutor focuses on then-P
-
Why Trump’s Conviction Can’t Stand
It rests on an intent to violate a state
-
Harris and Schumer Target the Supreme Court
By David B. Rivkin, Jr., and Andrew M. G
-
America Depends on Presidential Immunity
By David B. Rivkin, Jr., and Elizabeth P
Leave us a Reply