In this clip from the Wall Street Journal’s “Journal Editorial Reports”, David Rivkin addresses the Constitutional question of whether a sitting president can credibly be accused of “obstructing Congress”. He concludes that there are severe legal deficiencies associated with this idea, and with the way the House Democrats have tried to advance their agenda.
David Rivkin Online
Recent Tweets
Latest Articles
-
What Jack Smith Gets Wrong About Immunity
The special prosecutor focuses on then-P
-
Why Trump’s Conviction Can’t Stand
It rests on an intent to violate a state
-
Harris and Schumer Target the Supreme Court
By David B. Rivkin, Jr., and Andrew M. G
-
America Depends on Presidential Immunity
By David B. Rivkin, Jr., and Elizabeth P
Leave us a Reply